Sermon Tone Analysis

Overall tone of the sermon

This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.22UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.5LIKELY
Fear
0.13UNLIKELY
Joy
0.1UNLIKELY
Sadness
0.53LIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.8LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.91LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.86LIKELY
Extraversion
0.13UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.34UNLIKELY
Emotional Range
0.74LIKELY

Tone of specific sentences

Tones
Emotion
Anger
Disgust
Fear
Joy
Sadness
Language
Analytical
Confident
Tentative
Social Tendencies
Openness
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Emotional Range
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
There is a trend in our society to refuse to accept responsibility for our actions.
For example, those who engage in immoral behavior are described as "victims" of a sexual addiction.
By defining them as victims, they are excused from responsibility for their conduct.
A victim is one who is preyed upon or taken advantage of.
They are not responsible for what they do.
Consequently, we have absolved an entire generation of guilt.
We look upon people as being addicted to anger, abusive behavior, gambling, pornography, and the list grows each month.
Those involved are not to blame for what they do.
They are victims.
Evidence of this trend is also found in the way we assign blame to institutions for the evils of society.
We want to blame the government, Hollywood, and public education for the decline in moral values and the increase in violent crimes.
We want to hold industries responsible when (out of vanity, greed, or stupidity) we use their products to our harm.
In the blame game, everyone is at fault except "me."
One of the results of refusing to live responsibly and accept accountability is the effect it has on future generations.
Today, children are emulating the excesses of their parents.
Not content to be entertained by immorality and violence, they reenact it with alarming frequency.
We ask, "Who’s to blame?"
God holds both institutions /and/ individuals accountable.
That is the message that He delivers in this chapter.
He assigns blame.
He makes us face the fact that personal choices matter.
We will be held accountable for what we do /and/ the effect it has on others.
I. Assigning Blame – Verses 1-7
*A.
Accountability (1-2) /"for judgment is toward you"/*
#.
No one was excused from responsibility for the downward slide of the nation.
#.
The */priests/* were accountable for their compromise, dishonesty, and unfaithfulness.
#.
The */politicians/* ("O house of the king") were accountable for their wicked leadership and endorsement of immoral behavior.
#.
The */people/* ("ye house of Israel") were accountable for allowing themselves to be led astray, ignoring the voice of conviction and the preaching of the prophets.
Mizpah lay east of the Jordan River and Tabor lay west of the Jordan River.
This was how God demonstrated the involvement of the whole nation.
Everywhere you traveled in the land, people, princes, and priests had rebelled against God’s law and ignored His rebukes.
#.
It is significant that God began by assigning blame to the priesthood, reminding us that /judgment must begin at the House of God/ (1 Peter 4:17).
#.
God places spiritual leaders above political leaders because they should have been the first to cry out against the move towards idolatry and immorality.
#.
Instead, motivated by selfishness, greed, and lust for power, they had endorsed the very sins they were called to combat.
Robert Yackey tells of an event from his childhood that illustrates the accountability of spiritual leaders.
One Spring morning as his family drove to church, he noticed all the sheep in a neighboring pasture lying on the ground.
At first, he thought they must all be asleep.
Then he realized they were all dead.
Over 1000 sheep had frozen to death as a late cold front descended upon the area.
They were innocent victims of a rancher who had sheared them too early, motivated by a desire to get his wool to market while the price was still high.
The were killed by the rancher’s greed – the one who should have known better, who should have considered the effect of his actions upon the flock he cared for.
– Evangelical Missions Quarterly (3) 1994.
*B.
Attitudes (3 - 5a)*
In verse 3, God makes a distinction between "Ephraim" and "Israel."
* Generally, /Ephraim/ is the name of *secular power*.
From the beginning, the Northern Kingdom had rejected God’s rule.
Jeroboam I had lead the nation into idolatry and each succeeding king had followed in his steps.
* /Israel/ is the name of *spiritual promise*.
It is a reminder that God had not broken His covenant relationship with the people even though they had defiled themselves with idolatry and immorality.
God knew the character of the nation.
He knew both the heart of its king and the heart of its people.
He finds each guilty of the same sinful attitudes.
#.
Stubbornness– verse 4
#.
It was not that Israel /could not/ change, but that they /would not/ change.
#.
Obsessed with idols, they soon forgot the Lord, nor were interested in knowing Him.
The /"spirit of whoredoms" /refers to an obsession with idolatry and the immoral behavior that accompanied idol worship.
Indulgence had become habit and habit had become compulsive behavior.
The people knew that idolatry was wrong, yet they stubbornly clung to their idols.
Today, their involvement would be described as an *addiction*.
God identifies it as a *choice*.
#.
Pride – verse 5a
People, priests, and rulers wore their pride on their faces like a badge of honor.
They flaunted their activities, mistaking God’s patience for either ignorance of their sins or lack of interest.
Pride and stubbornness kept them from seeking the Lord or acknowledging His ways.
*C.
Admonition (5b-7)*
#.
Israel’s evil influence
#.
Not only would Israel and Ephraim fall, but their idolatry had spread to Judah and would eventually result in its destruction
#.
Additionally, Israel’s unfaithfulness had resulted in the birth of /"strange children,"/ a generation to whom the truth of God was totally foreign.
#.
Israel’s inability to find God – Verse 6
The time would come when Israel would rush to offer sacrifices to appease the Lord and escape the painful effects of judgment.
However, they would discover that God had withdrawn Himself, leaving them to experience judgment without mercy (Lo-ruhamah) until they recognized the true condition of their heart.
They needed to learn that obedience is better than sacrifice (1 Samuel 15:22) and a just, humble walk with God is of more value than the blood of flocks of rams (Micah 6:7-8).
#.
Israel’s impending destruction – /"now shall a month devour them"/
#.
A month is a symbol of a short time.
#.
Once judgment began to fall, it would destroy them swiftly.
II.
Announcing Judgment – Verses 8-14
As we have already learned, God’s judgment would come in the form of an invasion by the Assyrian army that would result in the destruction of the nation and the captivity (and exile) of the survivors.
Although history would count Israel among the victims of the Assyrian advance, the Bible records that their fall resulted from God’s judgment.
*A.
The futility of resistance (8-9)*
In verses 8 and 9, God tells the nation to sound the alarm and rally their troops, but it would be to no avail.
Their prophesied destruction would "surely" come to be.
*B.
The failure of God’s people *
#.
Although Israel was the primary target of God’s judgment, Judah would not come away unscathed.
Verse 10
#.
God compares them to landowners who remove the boundary markers between their property and that of their neighbor.
#.
Although Judah had not turned wholly to idolatry, they were guilty of diminishing the moral and spiritual boundaries that set them apart from Israel.
Israel’s destruction would come like a moth that eats away at clothing, its evidence outward and immediate.
Judah’s destruction would come like "rottenness" that slowly destroys wood from the inside out.
It takes much longer before you see the evidence, but by then it is usually too late to do anything about it.
#.
Again God informs the nations that they were to blame for the judgment that was to come.
#.
Ephraim /willingly/ /walked after the commandment /[of men].
Their obsession with idols resulted from a willing rejection of God’s truth.
#.
When the nation recognized its "sickness," the moral decadence that was destroying its nation, instead of turning to God for healing, it turned to human agents, the Assyrians.
There are a couple of significant observations to be made at this point.
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9