Sermon Tone Analysis

Overall tone of the sermon

This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.1UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.11UNLIKELY
Fear
0.1UNLIKELY
Joy
0.62LIKELY
Sadness
0.58LIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.68LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.34UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.89LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.6LIKELY
Extraversion
0.07UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.6LIKELY
Emotional Range
0.72LIKELY

Tone of specific sentences

Tones
Emotion
Anger
Disgust
Fear
Joy
Sadness
Language
Analytical
Confident
Tentative
Social Tendencies
Openness
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Emotional Range
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
Dearly loved people of God,
There are two themes I’d like to focus on in this passage.
It’s a long reading; lots we could talk about, but let’s experiment with pulling on two threads: blindness and sin.
The most obvious example of blindness is the beggar.
He was born blind.
He can find his way around town, but relies on help - directions, guidance, and the coins and food he gets by begging.
He accepts Jesus’ help.
He accepts the spit and dirt on his eyes.
He obeys Jesus’ instructions to wash in the Pool of Siloam.
After washing, this man born blind can see!
He also gains a view of Jesus that gets clearer as he faces questions from the Pharisees, but more on that later.
Interwoven into the story of the blind man’s healing and the investigation that results is the theme of sin and sinners.
In fact, that’s where we begin.
The disciples as Jesus about the beggar.
It’s probably not our first thought when we see someone with a disability.
But it was a common thought among the Jews of Jesus’ day.
They base it in the 2nd commandment:
Deut.
For those of you who have studied the OT in depth, you’ll remember in the account of Job losing his possessions, children, and health, how Job’s friends assume that un-confessed guilt is the root of Job’s misfortune.
Jesus doesn’t buy it, though.
It’s a helpful correction to our theology.
Disabilities like blindness are not a result of personal sin, but part of the brokenness of the world since the fall.
It’s humbling to realize that the reverse is also true.
Our health, strength, and abilities aren’t reasons for pride, for they aren’t a result of righteousness or goodness.
We receive such gifts by God’s grace.
Thankfully, we don’t receive what we deserve.
For we fall short of God’s calling to goodness.
You can judge your own success, but I know I fall short of God’s goodness.
The consequences for sin is death.
What about Jesus, though?
The question is fiercely debated about whether or not Jesus is a sinner.
There’s a lot at stake.
The Pharisees realize that if Jesus truly is righteous, if he is truly the Messiah coming from God the Father, they need to pay attention.
But that confession is too threatening, too humbling.
They don’t have an appetite for humble pie.
They have already judged that Jesus is someone to reject and ignore.
Instead, they line up the arguments in favour of Jesus being a sinner:
And
John 9.
The assumptions of the Pharisees make them blind to the possibility that Jesus could be the Messiah.
They aren’t willing to receive help from Jesus.
They just cannot see Jesus as their teacher, Messiah, and Saviour.
Jesus’ judgement is haunting.
But the man born blind reaches a different conclusion.
He accepts his healing as a sign of Jesus’ identity.
He may or may not know all the Scripture passages about God listening to a righteous man’s prayer.
Here are two examples:
ps 15.
There are other verses that indicate that God doesn’t listen to the prayers of the unrighteous.
For the man born blind, the fact that Jesus cured his blindness is a sign that Jesus is righteous and a messenger from God.
He testifies before the Pharisees
So
P
p
For the man born blind, now that his sight has been healed, he can see it clearly: Jesus is a prophet.
He’s a man from God. He’s the Messiah.
He’s the Son of Man, long foreseen in the OT.
When Jesus affirms the truth, the man born blind is willing to believe.
We’ve traced this promise throughout John’s gospel.
It’s a theme that gives us comfort.
Jesus is the Saviour.
In love and mercy, God the Son came into his creation.
He brought words of healing and truth throughout his ministry.
Throughout his life, especially at the cross, Jesus suffered the punishment we deserve, even though he was good, righteous, and without sin.
He’s the perfect substitute.
At the cross, God the Father put all our punishment on Jesus so that he died the death we deserve.
Then he rose again.
All his healings, all his signs, point to the restoration and new life that began when Jesus rose from the grave.
Those who believe in Jesus gain eternal life - a life to glorify God, celebrate our renewal, and bear witness for what God has done.
For those with eyes to see, Jesus is the Saviour, the Messiah, the Son of God.
It’s a humbling confession to make.
The contrast between the Pharisees and the man born blind make that clear.
It’s a tough thing to admit you need help.
In some ways, it kills us to admit we cannot do it on our own.
The Pharisees couldn’t accept Jesus’ help.
It killed them.
The man born blind was accustomed to receiving help.
He was humble enough to submit to mud going on his eyes.
Humble enough to bath where Jesus told him too.
He was willing to accept that Jesus was the Messiah, even against the strong pressure of rejection by the leaders of his religion, the leaders of his people.
As a result of his faith, he gained sight.
By believing in Jesus, he gained eternal life.
Can you see what he saw?
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9