Sermon Tone Analysis

Overall tone of the sermon

This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.47UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.19UNLIKELY
Fear
0.11UNLIKELY
Joy
0.48UNLIKELY
Sadness
0.49UNLIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.72LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.1UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.86LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.74LIKELY
Extraversion
0.28UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.55LIKELY
Emotional Range
0.69LIKELY

Tone of specific sentences

Tones
Emotion
Anger
Disgust
Fear
Joy
Sadness
Language
Analytical
Confident
Tentative
Social Tendencies
Openness
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Emotional Range
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
“Jesus also said to the disciples, ‘There was a rich man who had a manager and charges were brought to him that this man was wasting his possessions.
And he called him and said to him, “What is this that I hear about you?
Turn in the account of your management, for you can no longer be manager.”
And the manager said to himself, “What shall I do, since my master is taking the management away from me?
I am not strong enough to dig, and I am ashamed to beg.
I have decided what to do, so that when I am removed from management, people may receive me into their houses.”
So, summoning his master’s debtors one by one, he said to the first, “How much do you owe my master?”
He said, “A hundred measures of oil.”
He said to him, “Take your bill, and sit down quickly and write fifty.”
Then he said to another, “And how much do you owe?”
He said, “A hundred measures of wheat.”
He said to him, “Take your bill, and write eighty.”
The master commended the dishonest manager for his shrewdness.
For the sons of this world are more shrewd in dealing with their own generation than the sons of light.
And I tell you, make friends for yourselves by means of unrighteous wealth, so that when it fails they may receive you into the eternal dwellings.
“‘One who is faithful in a very little is also faithful in much, and one who is dishonest in a very little is also dishonest in much.
If then you have not been faithful in the unrighteous wealth, who will entrust to you the true riches?
And if you have not been faithful in that which is another’s, who will give you that which is your own?
No servant can serve two masters, for either he will hate the one and love the other or he will be devoted to the one and despise the other.
You cannot serve God and money.’”
[1]
“Put your money to work for you.”
This slogan was popularised by a foreign owned bank during the time it sought to become established in Canada.
Though you perhaps imagine that this slogan was coined by that bank, the concept is actually quite old.
Money is a tool—nothing more and nothing less.
Wealth can bless an individual, or wealth can curse an individual.
The factor determining whether money is a blessing or a curse lies in how wealth is used.
The Master provided an example of fiscal wisdom with a story about a manager working in the employ of a rich man.
That story and the commentary Jesus appended serves as the text for our message this day.
Jesus used the story to teach an important truth to the people of that distant day when He walked the dusty hills of Judea.
The lessons provided by the story are still applicable to people in this day.
Wealth may not be all that we imagine it to be.
Money could not keep an ex-President of our neighbours to the south from experiencing the effects of eating too many hamburgers—he required a quadruple bypass surgery despite his rapid accumulation of wealth through demanding payments of a half-million dollars for a single speech.
Neither has wealth spared wealthy homeowners in Florida from the effects of repeated hurricanes, although it is undoubtedly easier to rebuild after the winds have passed on.
Money is a tool.
To be of benefit, money must be put to work.
If all that is accomplished with money is the accumulation of more money, it is doubtful that the individual accumulating understands the purpose of wealth.
If all that is accomplished with wealth is consuming wealth on pursuing personal desires, it is doubtful that the spendthrift understands the purpose of wealth.
It would be wise to learn how to use the tool of wealth wisely.
*A BRIEF RECOUNTING OF THE STORY JESUS TOLD* — The setting for this story is important if we will understand Jesus’ teaching.
The account is found in the sixteenth chapter of Luke’s Gospel.
Notice that Jesus told this story immediately after He had related three parables concerning the joy associated with finding that which had been lost.
Jesus told of a lost sheep [LUKE 15:1-7], a lost coin [LUKE 15:8-10] and a lost boy—the latter account being the parable of the prodigal son [LUKE 15:11-32].
Our text then begins by informing, “He also said to the disciples.”
This is a literary device alerting us to the fact that what has preceded lays a foundation for what we are about to read.
The stories Jesus told before relating this account were for the benefit of someone other than His disciples.
Those others to whom He had been speaking were the Pharisees and the scribes [LUKE 15:2].
The verse immediately following our text helps us understand this parable.
“The Pharisees, who were lovers of money, heard all these things, and they ridiculed Him” [LUKE 16:14].
The Pharisees and scribes presented themselves as moral arbiters of society and as paragons of ethical values; and yet, they are exposed as “lovers of money.”
Scripture informs us that contrary to their public personae, the Pharisees and scribes were completely materialistic.
The setting that we have for this story, then, is a crowd of people surrounding Jesus one Sabbath day [2] as He neared the Cross.
In fact, this particular day was less than six months before the Cross.
Time was short for communicating matters of eternal importance.
On this particular day, Jesus addressed the religious leaders, telling them that all Heaven rejoiced at the salvation of sinners.
He cautioned these religious men against materialism.
Remember, despite claiming to be the spiritual and moral elite of the land, these religious leaders were utterly materialistic.
Though addressing His disciples, Jesus knew that the Pharisees and scribes were listening with great interest.
The Master moved from a discussion of the joy realised at finding what was lost to the wise use of that which has been entrusted to each of us.
If we claim to be moral and ethical people, we must realise that we will be judged by the manner in which we handle the goods entrusted to us.
We possess nothing through our own strength.
God gives strength, ability and opportunity [see 1 CORINTHIANS 4:7]; indeed, God gives every good and perfect gift [see JAMES 1:17].
Thus, all that we hold, we hold as administrators.
Jesus told the story of a crooked manager who worked for a wealthy man.
Word came to the wealthy man that the manager had taken advantage of his position to steal.
We witness something akin to this story as the Auditor General gives repeated reports concerning the mismanagement of government moneys.
His reports forcefully remind politicians that the moneys they spend in such a cavalier do not belong to them; rather, the government is responsible to act on behalf of the people.
The wealthy man in this parable was defrauded by one whom he trusted.
When the manager realised that the books were about to be audited, he had ample reason to be concerned since the audit would expose him as having wasted the money of the rich man who happened to be his employer.
In light of his subsequent actions, we can well believe that he not only wasted the man’s money, but he likely was stealing as well!
Continuing the story He was telling, Jesus portrayed the dishonest manager as weighing his options.
He knew he was about to be fired, or even jailed.
He reasoned that he was not strong enough to perform manual labour.
We might conclude that it is likely that this was less a matter of disability than it was a disinclination to labour with his hands.
Physical labour had no appeal for him.
About the only decent thing we can say about this crooked manager is that he was ashamed to beg.
He was a scoundrel, a scamp, a scallywag, a rogue of the first order.
The only answer that suggested itself to this man was to defraud his master to an even greater extent.
Therefore, he went to one debtor who owed a hundred measures of oil and reduced the bill to fifty.
Another debtor owed one hundred measures of wheat, and the corrupt administrator changed the debt to eighty.
There is neither rhyme nor reason to the disparity in the reductions granted, except to say that he was a swindler and a cheat.
These remissions of debt were at the expense of the rich man; but the thieving steward acted as he did in the hope that he would have a place to work after he was fired.
He hoped that those who benefitted from his thievery would treat him kindly when he was at last dismissed from his position.
The strange twist in the story Jesus told, was that at the last, the rich man who had been robbed commends the thief for his shrewdness.
Isn’t that an odd way for Jesus to conclude a parable intended to teach moral precepts?
It is certainly different from what we may have anticipated under most circumstances.
Be very careful in any conclusion you may draw; the story conveys more than is apparent on the surface.
Never does our Lord commend the thief because he was a thief.
The actions of the dishonest manager were in no way laudable, nor does Jesus in the least hint that He approved of such action.
Then, what conclusion can we draw?
That is the matter we must now consider.
*THE PURPOSE FOR JESUS’ STORY* — Why do you suppose Jesus told such a strange story?
The answer to this question is revealed in the closing statements.
“The sons of this world are more shrewd in dealing with their own generation than the sons of light.
And I tell you, make friends for yourselves by means of unrighteous wealth, so that when it fails they may receive you into the eternal dwellings” [LUKE 16:8].
I urge you to take careful note of the first of these two statements.
“The sons of this world are more shrewd in dealing with their own generation than the sons of light.”
Jesus is drawing a contrast between the sons of this world and the sons of light.
The scribes and Pharisees were clearly identified as the sons of this world, as is anyone who lives only for the things that must pass away with the passing of this world.
The disciples who were also listening were identified as the sons of light.
The scribes and Pharisees, performing their assorted religious duties, would ultimately pass away and have no permanent impact; but the disciples were about to go out into the world to carry on the work of the Kingdom of God.
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9