Sermon Tone Analysis

By Pastor Glenn Pease

An Irishman on holiday in New York went into a drug store and asked for a small tube of toothpaste.

When the clerk handed him a tube he noticed it was marked large.

"I'd rather have a small one," he said.

"Listen bud," the clerk replied.

"In this country toothpaste comes in three sizes: Large, giant, and super.

So if you want a small tube ask for large-see?"

The mystified traveler found himself caught up in the topsy turvy world of believe it or not paradox where large can be the smallest thing available.

There may be limits to what fiction can produce, but most anything can be true in reality.

The proof that truth is often stranger than fiction is the fact that the first Christians were also the first doubters, deniers, and disbelievers in the resurrection of Christ.

The paradox of Christian disbelievers is a biblical fact, believe it or not.

That first glorious Easter dawn is glorious to us as we look back from our point of view, but for those actually participating in that first Easter it was far from glorious.

In fact, as strange as it may seem, the first Easter was the day of the greatest unbelief in history.

We think our day is one of unbelief and skepticism, but it cannot match the unbelief of the first Easter.

I doubt is there is any period of history that can match it, for it is the only time in history where all believers were unbelievers.

Believe it or not, there was not a single Christian who even showed a sign of belief in the resurrection of Christ until they were compelled to believe by His very appearance.

Everyone of them, without exception, was a confirmed skeptic and doubter.

We are so use to making the quick transition from gloomy Good Friday to glorious Easter morning, that we tend to ignore the fact that Jesus had to work all day before He convinced His own disciples that He was really risen and alive.

The transition from gloom to glory was not as swift as we have come to make it.

It was a difficult process of persuasion, and not an instantaneous transformation.

As Christians, we often act as if belief was an easy thing, and an effortless goal to attain, but this is not being realistic about man's nature, and His natural skepticism.

When it comes to the matter of death and life beyond the grave, men have deep seeded doubts.

All the evidence of our senses is against it, and man longs for evidence of the senses to destroy his doubts.

We are so dependent upon physical facts for assurance.

Tennyson wrote,

O Christ, that it were possible

For one short hour to see

The souls we loved, that they might tell us

What and where they be.

When James Russell Lowell returned from the funeral of one he loved dearer than life, he said to those who tried to comfort him with the hope of communion in spirit,

Forgive me,

But I who am earthly and weak,

Would give all my income from dreamland,

For a touch of her hand on my cheek.

Were these men deniers of the faith?

Not at all!

They were simply expressing the fact that belief and faith do not come easy.

The demand of the human mind for concrete evidence is so strong that the leap of faith is hard to take.

The biblical record recognizes this, and so, believe it or not, the first believers were not men and women of faith, but men and women of fact.

They would not accept anything by faith.

They not only would not take a leap of faith, they would not even take a step of faith.

All the critics of the resurrection have failed to recognize that all of their false theories to explain the resurrection away were originated on the first Easter by the Christian disciples themselves.

We shall see this as we go along.

A. B. Bruce, the great Bible scholar, wrote, "The disciples were not clever, quick-witted, sentimental men such as Renan makes them.

They were stupid, slow-minded persons; very honest, but very unapt to take in new ideas.

They were like horses with blinders on, and could see only in one direction,-that, namely, of their prejudices.

It required the surgery of events to insert a new truth into their minds.

Nothing would change the current of their thoughts but a dam work of undeniable fact.

They could be convinced that Christ must die only by His dying, that He would rise only by His rising, that His kingdom was not to be of this world, only by the outpouring of the Spirit at Pentecost and the vocation of the Gentiles.

Let us the thankful for the honest stupidity of these men.

It gives great value to their testimony.

We know that nothing but facts could make such men believe that which nowadays they get credit for inventing.

Therefore, believe it or not, the most solid historical foundation for our belief is the determined unbelief of the Christians on that first Easter.

Our text reveals the climax of the day when they finally came to a point of recognition and rejoicing.

But let us look at the record of the rest of the day where we see resignation and resistance.

Not a single Christian greeted the first Easter dawn with a ray of hope.

The women made their way to the tomb to finish preparation of their Lord's body.

They were obviously convinced that He was dead, and that He would remain dead.

The men remained behind weeping in hopeless sorrow.

Death was victor, and the forces of evil had conquered.

The cross was the symbol of total disaster to them.

They held to their despair tenaciously, and rejected any evidence of the resurrection as some kind of hoax.

When the women found the stone rolled away, and the angel told them that Christ had risen, their reaction one of fear and unbelief.

Mark 16:8 says, "And they went out and fled from the tomb, for trembling and astonishment had come upon them, and they said nothing to anyone, for they were afraid.

Some of the women were brave, however, and they finally decided to tell the disciples.

Luke 24:11 says, "Their words appeared in their sight as idle talk, and they disbelieved them."

Mary Magdalene was the first to actually see the risen Christ, and she attempted to persuade the disciples, but Mark 16:10-11 says, "And she went and told them as they mourned and wept.

And they, when they had heard that He was alive, and had been seen by her, believe not."

The very first preacher of the good news of the resurrection could not even get a favorable response among the disciples of Christ.

The first Easter message was a total flop, even though everyone present was a disciple of Christ.

Here were dogmatic and determined disbelievers.

No hysterical, and emotionally controlled women were going to make fools out of these level headed, common sense directed, realistic fact finding disciples.

It was the disciples that originated the theory that the resurrection was the result of emotionalism, delusion, or hallucination.

They were the first to charge the women with an overactive imagination which invented the whole thing.

They, no doubt, looked upon these women as pathetic victims of their grief, while they as men, though sorrowful, still retained their grasp of reality.

Mary Magdalene was the originator of the theory that the body was stolen.

As she wept outside the tomb she said, "They have taken away my Lord, and I know not where they have laid Him."

The empty tomb proved nothing to her but that the body had been stolen.

Had she not been approached by Christ in person, she would have spent the first Easter searching for the body of Christ, and seeking for clues as to the thieves.

Jesus met two of the disciples on the road to Emmaus, and they were still sad and unbelieving, and they said, "We hoped that it was He which should redeem Israel."

They had heard all of the stories of the empty tomb, the angels message, and the testimony of Mary, but they were not convinced by any of this.

They were willing to believe that some other theory could account for all that had happened without it being a fact that Jesus was a live.

They were only convinced by a special act of revelation by which they recognized Christ.

When they ran to add their testimony to the increasing evidence we read in Mark 16:13, "And they went away and told the rest; neither believed they them."

Their unbelief was not based on their distrust of women preachers, for here were male evangelists that also failed to penetrate their shield of disbelief.

So what do we find at the end of the first glorious Easter?

We find a group of fear filled disciples huddled in a room, and afraid for their lives, with no confidence or assurance.

They were confused, bewildered, and, no doubt, wondered if they were going mad.

They would have been okay with the theory that they were the victims of hallucination, or any other theory.

Then Jesus appeared in their midst, and they were terrified.

They thought they were seeing a ghost.

That first Easter was about as joyful as spending a night in a literally haunted house.

They must have been emotionally exhausted from all the sorrow, confusion, and fear.

How realistic the biblical picture is.

And inventor would have had them singing the Hallelujah Chorus by the empty tomb, but real life is not like that.

David Read writes, "Let me ask you this: If you lost a very dear friend in sudden death, and then after two days you suddenly saw him materialize in front of you, exactly as he was-would you immediately and spontaneously be overcome with joy and delight?

Would you really be glad?

I believe that you and I would be frankly terrified.

We should most likely ring for the nearest psychiatrist."

The realism of the biblical record has convinced many a skeptic of its authenticity.