Sermon Tone Analysis
Overall tone of the sermon
This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.17UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.55LIKELY
Fear
0.12UNLIKELY
Joy
0.55LIKELY
Sadness
0.56LIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.83LIKELY
Confident
0.12UNLIKELY
Tentative
0UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.95LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.06UNLIKELY
Extraversion
0.42UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.45UNLIKELY
Emotional Range
0.3UNLIKELY
Tone of specific sentences
Tones
Emotion
Language
Social Tendencies
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
“Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness
for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet and sweet
for bitter!”
Isaiah 5:20 KJV 1611
If your interested in a little truth, I am going to talk to you today about Old
Speech and New Speech.
Now I can tell you I 100% believe that Old Speak
and New Speak is exactly what Isaiah 5:20 is talking about.
Firstly let me explain what Old Speak and New Speak is and what the purpose
of New Speak.
Old Speak and New Speak are two opposites of each other to
Provide two different descriptions of a word, behaviour or pattern of behaviour
The purpose of New Speak is to redefine Old Speak to the opposite of its
original meaning, with the goal of corrupting the original meaning and the
behaviour of society.
I will throw a couple of examples your way.
Old Speak (Abortion = Murder) New Speak (Abortion = Pro Choice)
Now before I get into this, just for a moment think about the two Phrases.
Now I am going to break this down for you, forgive me, for those who are
awake enough to figure it out, this is for those who are still asleep.
One
describes abortion as being Murder, which is evil!!! (duh!) the other
describes abortion as a choice a “woman's right” Now we all love a choice
dont we? “freedom” and all that.
So a Choice is a good thing.
Woe unto them
that call evil good and good evil!
Now with this example in mind, see the poison in this.
No-body would say
Murder is a good thing in open statement.
A cozy phrase or sentance must be
provided to make Murder look attractive.
In this case Pro-Choice is a very
sly, clever and decieving statement.
I mean who is going to be against Choice?
It is in itself also double speech as the little baby inside the woman's womb
does not have quite the same choice.
Look at James 1:8
“A double minded man is unstable in all his ways.”
God Hates hands that shed innocent blood see Proverbs 6:17
Lets move unto example number two
Old Speak (Gay = To be happy/Glad) New Speak ( Gay = Sodomite/Sodomy)
OK, you get the idea by now.
Why was such a word Chosen to describe
someone, who commits that abomination?
Well if you understand the purpose of new speak as explained earlier in this
message, it is to corrupt the original meaning and to thereby give some
sort of man made legitimacy to all kinds of depravity.
So by changing the meaning of the word Gay which is to be happy and
glad.
Which is a good thing, to then exchange the meaning of that word
to mean Sodomite.
You see claiming the word Gay for a Sodomite
somehow makes that act more appealing in the opinion of the blind.
It also gives the Sodomite more legitimacy in the eyes of the wicked.
Once again it is double speech!
Look at these Sodomites, do they look
happy??!!?? of course not!!! one the highest rate of suicide among young
people is those who claim to be “gay” they are not happy, they are miserable.
Third Example
Old Speak (Wicked = Evil) New Speak (Wicked = Good, Awesome)
This one is more for the younger generation, its a word that was thrown
around even when I was a kid and I am in my 30's now!
This was is pretty self explanatry but I thought I would mention it.
Forth Example
Old Speak (Discrimination = Bad) New Speak (Discrimination = Positive)
Now I have dropped this in at the end, this is the height of double speech.
In the UK now Police Forces MUST except a certain number of Non-White
Men/Woman.
Irrelevant of potential or non potential, that percentage must be
met.
It is called “Positive Discrimination.”
Now why cant Police acceptance be
based on Potential abilty only??? isnt that the whole idea? to accept only the
very best, no matter what their skin colour or ethinic background.
Now understand this, wheather you are accepting a person or rejecting
a person based on skin color then thats discrimination.
Ok so lets break this down for the super blind.
Discrimination = Bad, right?
Bad = Negative, correct?
Yet according to the
Phrase “positive discrimination” there is a positive form of discriminating
and you know what that is?
It is positive to discriminate against the white race.
The stupid politically
correct preachers, teachers and the man on the street cant see it.
You know what,
Its sad.
That is the hidden message in that.
There in is also lies the double
speech.
Now thats just a few examples of what I am talking about.
“That this is a rebellious people, lying children, children that will not hear
the law of the Lord.”
Isaiah 30:9
A-Men
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9