Sermon Tone Analysis

Overall tone of the sermon

This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.46UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.14UNLIKELY
Fear
0.1UNLIKELY
Joy
0.55LIKELY
Sadness
0.49UNLIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.74LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.68LIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.96LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.57LIKELY
Extraversion
0.56LIKELY
Agreeableness
0.62LIKELY
Emotional Range
0.65LIKELY

Tone of specific sentences

Tones
Emotion
Anger
Disgust
Fear
Joy
Sadness
Language
Analytical
Confident
Tentative
Social Tendencies
Openness
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Emotional Range
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
lass=MsoNormal>May the words of my mouth and the mediations of all our hearts, be acceptable in your sight – Our strength and our redeemer – Amen 
/“Let the one who boasts, boast in the Lord.”/
(1 Corinthians 1:31)/   /
            Here’s a little humour for you – I hope that you receive it in the spirit that it is delivered
 
There were 3 good arguments that Jesus was Irish:  
1.
He never got married 
2.
He was always telling stories  
3.
He loved green pastures 
 
But then there were 3 equally good arguments that Jesus was Italian:  
1.
He talked with His hands  
2.
He had wine with His meals  
3.
He used olive oil  
 
But then there were 3 equally good arguments that Jesus was a Californian:  
1.
He never cut His hair  
2.
He walked around barefoot all the time   
3.
He started a new religion  
 
But then there were 3 equally good arguments that Jesus was a North American Indian:  
1.
He was at peace with nature  
2.
He ate a lot of fish  
3.
He talked about the Great Spirit  
 
But then there were 3 equally good arguments that Jesus was Jewish:  
1.
He went into His Father's business  
2.
He lived at home until he was 33  
3.
He was sure his Mother was a virgin and his Mother was sure He was God  
 
But the most compelling evidence of all - 3 proofs that Jesus was a woman:  
1.
He fed a crowd at a moment's notice when there was virtually no food  
2.
He kept trying to get a message across to a bunch of men who just didn't get it  
3.
And even when He was dead, He had to get up because there was still work to do 
 
/“Let the one who boasts, boast in the Lord.”
/(1 Corinthians 1:31)/  /
 
This is intended to be humorous and not offensively racial, if you were offended, I apologize…that was not my intention.
It is, in most of the examples, racial or racial profiling, and at the very least stereotyping.
This is something that *in* our western, progressive culture is not acceptable
Police forces and airport security get a black eye when they are caught profiling by stereotypes, especially if those stereotypes are racial
 
Our passage from St. Paul’s 1st letter to the Corinthian church has, /in the very first chapter/, St. Paul doing just that – /“Jews demand signs and Greeks desire wisdom”/ (1 Corinthians 1:22)
            To our modern ear this might seem racist, or at the least racial profiling
                        And you might be offended by his rhetorical technique
 
Well, that is not the only place where St. Paul could be heard as making a statement that might offend
/26Consider your own call, brothers and sisters: not many of you were wise by human standards, not many were powerful, not many were of noble birth.
27But God chose what is foolish in the world to shame the wise; God chose what is weak in the world to shame the strong; 28God chose what is low and despised in the world, things that are not, to reduce to nothing things that are, 29so that no one might boast in the presence of God.
(1 Corinthians 1:26-29)/
/ /
I love reading St. Paul
I love his passion, the life he lived as a witness to our Lord,
I enjoy and find great wisdom from his compelling arguments
And in general his desire to proclaim the gospel by whatever means possible
By whatever rhetorical device he can used to challenge people into paying attention so that he can share the good news, the gospel
But it wasn’t always this way… just before I went into seminary, before I knew better and knew St. Paul’s and his writing better – I didn’t like him at times
I found that he would brag too much – that he was sometimes offensive, and in general I wondered if he could have presented his position with more humility and subtlety
                    Basically, I wished he was more Canadian – … in a way I wished he was more like me
 
This is not an unusual thing to do; in fact some might say that it is part of the human condition
Although St Paul was not God, but a prophet and apostle of God, there was still a desire, by me, to wish that he was moulded in my image… and not me in his
And as part of the human condition, it is not uncommon for us to profile God to look a lot like us
Remember my opening attempt at humour, all the attributes – made Jesus like the whatever group was the focus
Consider also the classical paintings of Jesus – made by white Europeans – Jesus looks a lot like them – white and tall
When in reality the average appearance of Jewish man 2000 years ago would have been shorter and olive skinned
 
All these things that we do that make God in our own image – or understand the wisdom of God by our own parameters… are stumbling blocks and foolishness
 
According to the ancient philosopher Aristotle, “Nature abhors a vacuum.”
Aristotle based his conclusion on the observation that nature requires every space to be filled with something, even if that something is colorless, odorless air.
And it is the same in our understanding about God and the wisdom of God
                      We hate a vacuum in knowledge and fill the space with our cultural perspective
 
Then… as now - there are generally two ways of authenticating divine presence and activity:
      Signs and wisdom.
Here Paul, using a rhetorical device by classifying humanity into two broad groups: Jews and Greeks.
The one looks for signs, dramatic demonstration of the presence of God.
The other looks for logical explanations.
Miracles and wisdom – these become the major ways of determining whether God is speaking or acting in the world.
[1]
 
So the question we are faced with today is a basic one:
Does authentic spirituality follow the pattern of Babel, with human beings constructing towers to heaven from building blocks of their own spiritual wisdom or philosophical insight?
OR Does true religion, rather, conform to the pattern of Sinai, where knowledge of God results from sovereign, divine decision to come down from heaven and establish fellowship with humanity?
… Paul, in this passage stresses that fellowship with God is a product of God’s decision to come to us.
He bases this claim on God’s act of reconciliation in the cross.[2]
The irony (indeed the paradox) of this divine scheme is that the cross is the last place where humanity would expect to discover God's ultimate wisdom and power.
The brilliance of God’s way is that it is not the human constructs of ‘God as man - only better’
                        Like some super-hero, like Spiderman, Superman or Wonder Woman
Or the mythical Greek Gods of Zeus, Apollo or Aphrodite
                                                But that God’s wisdom is beyond what we would have constructed
God… is not a reactive deity.
God has *not* sought out humanity according to the ways humanity has sought out God.
Rather, God has intentionally and decidedly destroyed the ways and means by which humanity decided get to God
/ /
Paul is presenting the divine enterprise which intentionally thwarts all human attempts to know or find God.
This is the divine initiative of the cross.
/ /
Where today, when we see and think of the cross in our cultural perspective
            We think of it as a piece of jewelry or a decoration for a church
The cross is so culturally understood as the main symbol of Christianity that it has lost much of its original power
The cross of 2000 years ago was reserved for those disreputable individuals or groups such as rebellious slaves, insurrectionists, pirates, or brigands who had threatened the divinely sanctioned social order of the Empire.
Thus the cross was the imperial instrument used to suppress subversion.
As a public spectacle, crucifixion was an act geared to shame its victims through degradation, humiliation, and torture before, during, and even after death ensued.
At the same time, it was a political statement which declared that all who threatened the imperial social order would find themselves co-crucified with the current victim.
In some Jewish circles, it could also be regarded as a sign of divine curse
We read in Deuteronomy: /Hi//s corpse must not remain all night upon   the tree; you shall bury him that same day, for anyone hung on a tree is under God’s curse.//
/(Deuteronomy 21:23).
[3]
 
Into this cultural setting that we have the core of Paul's preaching which is: the word of the cross and the proclamation of Christ crucified.
This is not a message geared to win friends or influence people.
For many, anchored in this world, it is a stumbling block or just mere foolishness
/ /
The longer I look at the Greek people and their philosophies, these gentiles of yester-year, the more they look like Canadians of today.
These people, of centuries ago, enjoyed the blessings of political freedom in what was one of the earliest democracies.
They were cultured, highly intelligent, and educated, and very religious, but they had rejected God and exchanged the worship of the one true God for “gods” of their own.
How much like them our culture is
            With our worship of material stuff, always wanting and getting more
The latest smart phone or TV or car or keeping our houses up with the Jones – /For where your treasure is, there your heart will be also.
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9