Sermon Tone Analysis

Overall tone of the sermon

This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.2UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.12UNLIKELY
Fear
0.14UNLIKELY
Joy
0.47UNLIKELY
Sadness
0.55LIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.71LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.7LIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.75LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.45UNLIKELY
Extraversion
0.1UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.75LIKELY
Emotional Range
0.39UNLIKELY

Tone of specific sentences

Tones
Emotion
Anger
Disgust
Fear
Joy
Sadness
Language
Analytical
Confident
Tentative
Social Tendencies
Openness
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Emotional Range
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
*Inscription: Writing God’s Words on Our Hearts & Minds*
*/Part 33: What God Has Joined Together/*
*Matthew 19:3-9*
*/September 26, 2010/*
 
 
*Scripture reading: Matt 19:3-9 (Michel)*
 
Intro
 
Check out the art work.
The good old days?
This week I was reading about how *rampant* *divorce* has become.
One author observed sarcastically that some women seem to date their past not by *which* *year* it by which *marriage* they were on.
·         What makes this example worth mentioning is that he was writing in the *50’s*, not *1950’s*, but the original 50’s.
We have this idea that divorce is much more common now than back in “*olden* *days*,” but it was just as common, and even *more* *acceptable* in NT times as it is now.
It was in this *context* that they Pharisees addressed Jesus:
 
*Matthew 19:3-12 *  3 ¶ Some Pharisees came to him to test him.
They asked, “Is it lawful for a man to divorce his wife for any and every reason?”
Some *background*: There was a *debate* among the Pharisees.
One group said adultery was the only *grounds* for *divorce*.
But the other said could be anything displeasing, even burning supper.
·         As bad as our culture is, I have never heard “*poor* *cooking* skills” cited as the reason for divorce!
They were trying to pull Jesus into this fight.
They tried to make it a nice safe *political* *debate*.
They made it *hobby* of *nuancing* *laws* and *rulings*, like *fantasy* *football*.
·         They *ignored* all of the *pain* and *suffering* caused by their callous attitude – their debate *affected* *real* *people*.
Remember that Jesus came to “*fulfill* the *Law*,” to show its *intended* *purpose*, to *limit* sin, and reduce suffering.
Like they always did, the Pharisees looked for *workarounds* so that they could do what *they* *wanted* to do.
·         I always *thought* this passage was about *divorce* and *remarriage* – it’s *actually* about *marriage*
 
Jesus is trying to show them *God’s* *heart* towards marriage, and in doing so begins a *radically* *different* *perspective* towards marriage that we *still* *hold*.
What God has joined together
 
4 “Haven’t you read,” he replied, “that at the beginning the Creator ‘made them male and female,’  5 and said, ‘For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and the two will become one flesh’?
6 So they are no longer two, but one.
Therefore what God has joined together, let man not separate.”
(*Cut* *apple*) I want to *show* *you* *something* that you may not have noticed: Jesus is *quoting* straight from *Genesis*.
When it says that “he made them *male* and *female*” it means that *together*, male and female, they *reflected* *God’s* image.
Furthermore, it says that he created them male and female *before* he *made* *Eve*.
In other words, I think Adam was initially *complete* within himself, both *masculine* and *feminine*.
That’s *weird* to think about, isn’t it?
What kind of *movies* would he like?
Would he argue with himself about *getting* *directions*?
·         This is why Eve had to be created by taking a *part* of *Adam* out of him (Gen.
2:21).
In other words, God *tore* *Adam* into two (*pull* *apple* apart), so that he *find* his *completion* in her.
It’s almost as if we are not so much “*united*” with our spouse and “*reunited*.”
·         Husband and wife are bonded together in a way we can’t even *understand* – a *physical*, *emotional*, and *spiritual* union.
You complete me
 
When *Jerry* *McGuire* said “You complete me” he was uttering a profound theological truth.
The *two* are *stronger* *together* than they could ever be apart.
·         I read that *dad’s* let their children *wander* *further* than mothers, which is important because it teaches independence.
·         He’s not being *irresponsible*, he’s *training* them!
It’s like mixing *flour*, *sugar*, *butter*, *eggs*, and *chocolate* chips together – apart they are not that great, but together they find their *united* *purpose*.
Let no man separate
 
And also like *cookie* *batter*, once it’s mixed together, they *can’t* be *pulled* *apart*.
·         Literally, they cannot be pulled apart – once you are united in marriage, you will never *truly* be *separated* from them.
Through marriage, God *reconnects* a *man* and *woman*, they cannot be truly taken apart.
Their souls will *always* be *joined*.
It’s like *conjoined* *twins* – separating them is very dangerous because they share vital organs.
When you think of *miracle* of “the *two* *becoming* *one* flesh” and the *tragedy* of pulling them *apart*, you can understand why Jesus was so frustrated by their *caviler* *attitude*.
To singles
 
BTW: This does not mean that if you are not married you are *not* *complete* – you must find your *completion* in *God*.
There are things you can learn from God and ways that you can serve God that married people cannot.
·         No one can have *everything*, but everyone can be *content*.
While I am at it: Even if you are *not* *married*, I still want you to *pay* *attention*, because you maybe someday and because you may be *speaking* *into* the life of married friends.
yeah, but...
Not surprisingly, the Pharisees *reacted* to this.
Keep in mind that many of them had probably been *divorced* – they were trying to *justify* themselves.
7 “Why then,” they asked, “did Moses command that a man give his wife a certificate of divorce and send her away?”
8 Jesus replied, “Moses permitted you to divorce your wives because your hearts were hard.
But it was not this way from the beginning.
In other words, divorce was an *accommodation* for sin.
It wasn’t something God *created* or *wanted*, but a necessity because of hard hearts – *hearts* *not* *submitted* to God.
 
·         Divorce is yet another *proof* that we live in a *fallen* *world*.
It’s kind of like *keys*.
I wish that I didn’t need keys, because I keep losing them.
I wish it was like out in the country back in the day when you could keep your house unlocked and your keys in the car, but I still *lock* my *house* when I leave!
·         When Marilyn’s *purse* was *stolen* we had to rekey the house, all a reminder of effects of sin on our world.
I remember listening to a *missionary* to the Middle East share how *divorce* was *illegal* in that country.
I thought, “Wow, that’s great!” but he went on to tell about one woman whose husband wanted to get remarried, so he kept trying to kill her.
 
·         God permitted *commanded* *divorce* because it was the *lesser* of *two* *evils*.
Divorce was a *mercy* that *protected* *women* – else wise a man could leave and she couldn’t remarry and provide for herself.
PERMISSIBLE causes for divorce
 
9 I tell you that anyone who divorces his wife, except for marital unfaithfulness, and marries another woman commits adultery.”
This is one of the most studied passages of Scripture, but I am afraid we have *warped* *Jesus’* *intent* here:
 
Jesus meant to show us *God’s* *heart* for marriage, his deep *desire* to see a husband and wife *struggle* and *strive* to become *one*, to *reflect* his *image*, and demonstrate that *love* to *children*.
·         *Like* the *Pharisees*, we’ve turned it into a *new* *set* of laws by which we determine if a *divorce* is “*ok*.”
Let’s get back to the purpose: Divorce is *never* “*ok*,” it always *tears* *apart* of what God has made.
It’s like a *man* *made* *fire* destroying your *favorite* *forest*.
When you see a beautiful *family* *dog*, dead alongside the road, you should feel sad for that family, even though you don’t know them.
You should feel that same way even when you read about the latest *celebrity* *divorce*.
·         That is how God *feels* about *every* *divorce* it is always tearing apart something of his.
Let me state it even stronger – *divorce* is *always* a sin.
That doesn’t mean a person is always *sinning* by *filing* for a divorce.
They may need to because of their *spouses* *hardness* of *heart*.
·         Sin is what hurts *us*, *other*, and damages our *relationship* with *God*, and divorce always does *two* of *those*, usually all *three*.
Unforgivable sin?
At the same time, I want to say just as strongly that it is *not* the *unforgivable* sin.
For all *intents* and *purpose*, it has become that in *many* *churches*.
As I read a studied many church’s statements on divorce, I think they missed the point.
If the Pharisees became *too* *cavalier* about divorce, some *church* have become *too* *harsh*.
·         As with all sin, God is able to *forgive*, *redeem*, and *restore*.
Just cause
 
Again, this passage is *more* *about* *marriage* then divorce and remarriage, but *divorce* and *remarriage* are things that affects everyone of us – we have all been *affected* to *some* *degree*.
Accordingly, I need to spend a little more time discussing them, to bring *conviction* and *comfort* – conviction for those who have taken divorce *too* *lightly*, and comfort for the *plagued* by *guilt*.
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9