Sermon Tone Analysis

Overall tone of the sermon

This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.18UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.13UNLIKELY
Fear
0.14UNLIKELY
Joy
0.55LIKELY
Sadness
0.5UNLIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.03UNLIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.64LIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.82LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.06UNLIKELY
Extraversion
0.01UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.4UNLIKELY
Emotional Range
0.2UNLIKELY

Tone of specific sentences

Tones
Emotion
Anger
Disgust
Fear
Joy
Sadness
Language
Analytical
Confident
Tentative
Social Tendencies
Openness
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Emotional Range
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
!  “Holy” is not a 4-letter Word!
!! “Holy Joe” Reality Game
v  Goal: To correctly identify which of the self-proclaimed “Christian cast-members” was the real Christian.
v  How would you make that determination?
v  What if they all had great “salvation testimonies”?
You might not realize it - but you’ve just been trying to define the word “holy”.
v  *1 Pet 1:15-16* - One of the scariest verses in the New Testament.
Ø  WHA??????? ARE YOU SERIOUS???
Ø  Set in the context of the greatness of our salvation.
In response to this, the call to holiness is reasonable.
v  Ironic that one of the most revered descriptions of God is also one of the most feared descriptions of Christians.
v  But what is it about this call that puts us off sometimes?
I don’t always have a positive gut reaction to the word “holy”.
Sometimes holiness conjures up words like ...
Ø  Sterile, Dull, Boring
Ø  Plastic, Superficial
Ø  Nauseating
Ø  “Ned Flanders”
Ø  Judgmental, Critical, Proud
Ø  Untouchable
!! A.  Reacting to the word “Holy”
“Things we secretly think about holiness, but would never actually say out loud in church”
!!! 1.    Holiness is boring
v  Kid at camp, “Man this place is to holy for me.”
Ø  Have you ever gotten upset because people think you’re a “goody-goody” and you want to let them know “Hey, I have a wild side.
I run with scissors.”
§  I have seen friends do it.
I’ve done it to.
*Why is that?*
Ø  Do we have this idea that to be holy is to be boring?
\\ v  We want to be “sort of holy”, but not so holy as to become boring.
Ø  Holy enough to get a passing grade at church, but no so holy that we get a failing grade at work~/school
Ø  We prefer middle-ground, mediocre holiness.
Ø  *We want to be “holiocre”.*
§  Holy, but not too holy.
v  Being holy is like eating healthy.
Ø  Old Slogan: Anything fun is either illegal, immoral, or fattening.
Ø  “The healthier the food, the worse it tastes.
The tastier the food, the more unhealthy it is.”
v  Sin can appear surprisingly attractive, and holiness disappointingly dull.
!!! 2.    Holiness is burdensome
v  Sometimes we see holiness as a burden to be endured more than blessing to be celebrated.
v   “Be Holy” = Try harder.
Do more.
Follow the rules.
Ø  One website identified */667 sins /*listed in the Bible, although they admit that their list may still be incomplete.
Ø  You could sin twice a day and never repeat the same sin in a year!
Isn’t that wonderful?
Ø  It’s overwhelming.
v  Then on top of the rules specifically named in the Bible, religious traditions tends to add another layer of “derived rules” ~/ “slippery slope rules”.
Ø  These are the buffer zone guidelines.
§  Intent: To create a safety zone by avoiding even those things that – while not technically wrong – might take you too close to the edge.
Ø  Examples:
§  The best way to avoid the sin of drunkenness is avoid alcohol altogether.
§  The best way to avoid immodest dress is to define modesty in terms of inches above the knee or below the collar.
§  The best way to avoid sexual sin is to avoid extended social contact with anyone of the opposite sex.
§  The best way to avoid the junk on TV~/computer is not to have one.
Ø  Goal is wise and admirable: To avoid sin by staying as far away as possible.
Ø  Result is legalism: The “guidelines” eventually become “rules”.
What was once “amoral” (not sin) becomes “immoral” (a sin of tradition)
\\ v  We’ve some invented strange rules.
Ex.
Strange laws reported from USA
Ø  In Arkansas, it is illegal to mispronounce the word “Arkansas”
Ø  In Waterville, Maine, it is illegal to blow your nose in public.
Ø  In Gary, Indiana, it is illegal to attend a theatre within four hours of eating garlic.
Ø  In Illinois, it is illegal to speak English, you must speak American.
Ø  In Seattle, Washington, you can’t carry a concealed weapon that is over 6 feet in length
Ø  In Tennessee, it is illegal to sell bologna on Sunday
Ø  In California, a 1925 law declared it illegal to wiggle while dancing.
Ø  In West Virginia, you can be jailed for cooking sauerkraut or cabbage
Ø  In Virginia, it is illegal to tickle women
Ø  In Memphis, Tennessee, it is illegal for a woman to drive by herself, unless a man is walking or running in front of the vehicle, waving a red flag in order to warn approaching pedestrians and motorists
Ø  In Nicholas County, West Virginia, no clergy members may tell jokes or humorous stories from the pulpit during church services.
v  All these regulations probably began with serious, sober-minded discussion over a matter of significant social and moral concern.
Ø  All the rules derived by any given Christian traditions likewise began with sober discussion over weight moral and spiritual matters.
Ø  But somewhere along the line, wisdom became entangled with legalism.
Ø  And holiness became a heavy burden.
!!! 3.    Holiness is hypocritical
v  Common reaction to the burden of holiness: At least “fake it”
Ø  If you can’t be holy, at least /pretend/ to be holy.
Ø  So we learn to live within the external rules of our church~/context.
But inside, we often know that we’re just playing along.
We’re actors in a game
Ø  The NT word for actor is “hypocrite”.
v  Jesus openly confronted the Pharisees because they had turned the legitimate pursuit of holiness into a game of rules.
Ø  Pharisaism began as a legitimate concern for holiness
§  Don’t be too quick to pick on the Pharisees
Ø  But it became a contest of self-righteousness.
§  *Holiness became a matter of external appearances instead of inner righteousness.
*
\\ v  We instinctively object to hypocrisy – when we detect that someone is trying to appear better than they are.
v  *So, what do we do if we discover hypocrisy in ourselves?*
Ø  Excerpt from John Ortberg, /Life You’ve Always Wanted, /pg.
11-13.
/I am disappointed with myself.
I am disappointed not so much with particular things I have done as with aspects of who I have become.
I have a nagging sense that all is not as it should be.
\\ \\ /
/Some of this disappointment is trivial.
I wouldn’t have minded getting a more muscular physique.
I can’t do basic home repairs.
So far I haven’t shown much financial wizardry./
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9