Sermon Tone Analysis

Overall tone of the sermon

This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.13UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.16UNLIKELY
Fear
0.1UNLIKELY
Joy
0.59LIKELY
Sadness
0.5LIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.49UNLIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.75LIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.56LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.86LIKELY
Extraversion
0.39UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.9LIKELY
Emotional Range
0.68LIKELY

Tone of specific sentences

Tones
Emotion
Anger
Disgust
Fear
Joy
Sadness
Language
Analytical
Confident
Tentative
Social Tendencies
Openness
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Emotional Range
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
1,583 words
J06-24h
John 6:24-35
August 3, 2003
Wesley, Doncaster East
© John M. Connan
Do you speak another language other than English with any degree of fluency?
Not many third-generation Australians do.
But all of us learn at any early stage of life to speak a whole variety of what might be called English dialects.
Some parents teach their children baby-talk.
That’s a dialect in itself!
Then, having taught them baby-talk, they have to teach them standard English.
Once school age is reached, children learn the language of the playground – and the classroom.
Both are based on standard English, but have their own special variations.
Some of the schoolyard language may, in fact, find its way into standard English in time.
We don’t always realise how adept we become at learning and using such common dialectical variants of English.
But there are specialist dialects that are not so common: many never become adept at using them or understanding them.
Professions have their own special language.
You’ve probably, for instance, had to ask your doctor what he or she means from time to time.
Religious groups do as well.
You might laugh about the fact that the original superannuation fund in the Methodist Church was the “Worn-out Ministers’ Fund.” Ann certainly didn’t laugh, when I told her that, if I’d left her in a Methodist widow, she’d have been my relict!
The Methodist Church talked about ministers being stationed.
The Uniting Church at one stage talked about ministers being settled, but now we talk about ministers in placements.
And because religious communities tend to be based on authoritative revelation – in the case of the Christian faith: the Bible – we tend to be conservative and develop and retain theological language which becomes /our/ specialist dialect.
Anyone who’s been around the church adapts to this special language.
We become so adept at using it, that we fail to realise how much this might as well be a foreign language to others.
Grace is a beautiful word, filled with meaning.
But only for Christians!
When you know John Newton had been involved in the slave trade before becoming an Anglican clergyman, his hymn, /Amazing grace/, hits home to us, and speaks of God’s totally unearned and undeserved love to us.
Some years ago I realised I needed to explain /grace/ to parents bringing their children to baptism.
They didn’t understand – and didn’t ask what on earth I was talking about.
They just let me speak my special language, so they could get their children done!
I thought I’d hit on the way to get the meaning of grace across.
I’d talk about a grace-and-favour mansion – the residence the queen might give to a faithful retainer in retirement – free and without cost – out of sheer love.
I discovered my explanation baffled the parents even more than my religious language did.
The specialist language of grace-and-favour had disappeared in my lifetime!
If you want people to understand you, you have to speak their language.
John in his story of Jesus tells the story of Jesus feeding five thousand on the eastern side of the Sea of Galilee and then being pursued by those self-same people.
If Jesus could perform wonders of that sort once, they want more.
There’s always a market for special effects.
But, as so often happens in interactions between Jesus and others in John’s gospel, Jesus seems to ignore what’s said to him and to cut right through to the real issue.
“You didn’t come all the way around the lake just to see miraculous signs.
You came to have me feed you again.
Look, there’s more to life than food.
You have to work to grow your food.
You have to work to buy your food.
Work, instead, for food that will nourish you forever.
The food I’m talking about you can’t buy: I’ll give it to you for free.”
They heard, but didn’t listen.
Jesus had used /their/ language about /working/ for this food – but confused them by talking about it being given /for free/!
They knew nothing about business lunches – no free lunches for them.
It was: work – or die!
They worked for what they needed or wanted – in this life or the next.
That was how they understood physical life – /and/ religious life.
Work hard for what you want – or die.
Work equally hard by doing good works – or die without hope of life beyond death.
Earn you way in this life.
Earn you way into heaven.
We’ve not left behind that way of thinking.
Western capitalism is based on what‘s been called – rightly or wrongly – the Calvinist work ethic.
We have welfare systems, but, in the end, it’s work that matters.
Think back to the Income Tax return you’ve just filled in.
Yes, name and address and Tax File Number had to be filled in.
But so was your occupation.
As far as the government is concerned, you’re defined by what you /do/.
In fact, in any conversation with a stranger the question will eventually arise: “What do you do?” We’re categorised and defined by what we do.
Lotteries, gambling and games of chance may prove addictive to some, legacies to others; but for most of us, if we want it, we’d better earn it.
And, if we want the chance of heaven and eternal life, we’d better earn that, as well.
Two thousand years have passed, but the conversation between Jesus and those who made their way around the Sea of Galilee is as much for us as it was for those who went after Jesus for what they could get out of him.
And Jesus uses /our/ predilection and says: “The work God want is this: bank your spiritual capital in trust with me.”
They didn’t understand!
They were hung up with their predilection about work.
“Come on, Jesus, what are you going to do to convince us we should invest our spiritual capital with you?
We’re followers of Moses.
He led our people out of slavery and bondage, through the wilderness to the Promised Land.
On the way /he/ gave them manna, miraculous bread from heaven, to keep them going.”
And Jesus responds: “You rely on your legacy from Moses.
But what you say Moses gave you was, in fact, given by God.
Put your trust in God – and in me.
The manna you need to sustain you, /I/’ll give you.”
And Jesus makes the astonishing claim that /he/ will be food and drink for them – and /us/ – through their wilderness – and /ours/ – on the way to the Promised Land.
Do we work our passage to the Promised Land? “No,” says Jesus. “Trust me!
Journey with me! I’ll feed you on the way.
The way may not be easy: but I’ll be with you.
And it’ll cost you nothing more than believing we can make it together.”
That’s /grace/: nothing in the way of “work” to be done by us.
What’s needed to be done, Jesus has done already.
That’s God plan.
That’s God’s /gift/.
That’s God’s grace.
A phrase sticks in my mind – and I can’t shake loose from it!
Salvation is grace.
Ethics is thanksgiving.
God sets us on a journey to the Promised Land.
Jesus travels with us and feeds us on the way.
And it’s all free: no hidden conditions; no time-share club to join.
It’s free: a gift of love.
There’s /nothing/ we can or need to do to earn this gift or pay for it.
But, we /can/ show our gratitude.
We can model our lives on the life of Jesus.
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9