Sermon Tone Analysis

Overall tone of the sermon

This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.17UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.15UNLIKELY
Fear
0.14UNLIKELY
Joy
0.2UNLIKELY
Sadness
0.28UNLIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.7LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.85LIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.82LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.1UNLIKELY
Extraversion
0.11UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.29UNLIKELY
Emotional Range
0.46UNLIKELY

Tone of specific sentences

Tones
Emotion
Anger
Disgust
Fear
Joy
Sadness
Language
Analytical
Confident
Tentative
Social Tendencies
Openness
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Emotional Range
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
*Luke 3:23-38*
 
Introduction:  Today’s study centers on Luke’s genealogy.
It seems like a waste of space to most of us to include such material in the Bible.
But remember, the Bible was not originally written to us, but to the 1st century people.
We can learn things from this section of Scripture.
I.
About age 30    *vs.
23*
    A.
Mature
1. Bill ?
2. If we wait til we are prepared, most opportunities will pass us by.
3. On the other hand, there is a reason church leaders are “elders.”
B.
Approximate
         1.
Cannot be used for dating
         2.
And He was Jesus beginning about years 30.
a.
*ὡσεί*: a degree which approximates a point on a scale of extent, either above or below; about, approximately.
b.
Now Jesus himself was about thirty years old when he began his ministry.
NIV
             c.
And Jesus himself began to be about thirty years of age,   KJV
             d.
He, namely Jesus, when he made a beginning, was about thirty years of age,[1]    Distinguish from Father in *vs.
22*
 
II.
Genealogy     *vs.
23-38*
    A.
Reasons for
         1.
Establishing the humanity of Jesus  Son of God (*vs.
22*), descended from Adam (*vs.
38*)
2. Important to Jews, not so much to the Gentiles
         3.
Genealogies established individual identity; reflected, established, or legitimated social structures, status, and entitlements to office; functioned as modes of praise or delineations of character or even as basis of exhortation.1
B.
Problems
         1.
Different from Matthew
             a.
Could have come from LXX instead of MT
             b.
Neither genealogy is 100% accurate according to Western logic.
c.
Luke could be tracing Mary’s ancestors
             d.
Luke could be tracing Jesus’ ancestors through the line of David’s son, Nathan, instead of Solomon   *Jeremiah 22:24-30*   No mention of any of the kings after Solomon
         2.
Some of the names Luke uses, do not appear in OT
3.
Many spelling differences
    C.
Characteristics
         1.
Reversed from Matthew
         2.
78 names if you include God
         3.
Reversing the list, starting with Adam, and dividing the genealogy into sets of seven, places the following key figures in the seventh position: Enoch (v 37), Abraham (v 34), David (v 31), Joseph (v 30), Jesus (v 29), Joseph (v 24), Jesus (v 23).[2]
III.
Lessons
    A.
Age and maturity are related, but not absolutely dependent on each other
    B.
God’s details may not be the same as ours
    C.
All people come from God
    D.
Jesus came from God in a special way
 
Conclusion:  There is value in all the Bible.
I prefer spending my time on Scriptures that benefit me personally, not genealogies.
But as you have seen, we can learn even from odd (to us) sections of Scripture.
\\ ----
[1]Nolland, J. (2002).
/Vol.
35A/: /Word Biblical Commentary : Luke 1:1-9:20/.
Word Biblical Commentary (166).
Dallas: Word, Incorporated.
[2]Nolland, J. (2002).
/Vol.
35A/: /Word Biblical Commentary : Luke 1:1-9:20/.
Word Biblical Commentary (168).
Dallas: Word, Incorporated.
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9