Sermon Tone Analysis

Overall tone of the sermon

This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.53LIKELY
Disgust
0.18UNLIKELY
Fear
0.05UNLIKELY
Joy
0.58LIKELY
Sadness
0.17UNLIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.71LIKELY
Confident
0.01UNLIKELY
Tentative
0UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.97LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.71LIKELY
Extraversion
0.18UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.79LIKELY
Emotional Range
0.62LIKELY

Tone of specific sentences

Tones
Emotion
Anger
Disgust
Fear
Joy
Sadness
Language
Analytical
Confident
Tentative
Social Tendencies
Openness
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Emotional Range
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
*1 John 1:1-4*
 
Ø Many people think of Christianity as the Historic Profession of Belief in Jesus Christ
·        That is to say – it is the historic movement – or religion – that has unified around some common beliefs about Jesus
-       But rather than speaking of Christianity as the Historic Profession of faith in Jesus – it would be better to speak of it as the Profession of the Historic Jesus
·        That may not sound like much of a difference to you – but in reality – there is a huge difference between those two perspectives
-       Because history has proven that many, many people are willing to profess belief in Jesus – as long as they are able to redefine Him however they wish
·        And so you have cults – through the years – who have wanted to be regarded as essentially Christian
-       simply because they profess a belief in Jesus
-       yet it is a Jesus of their own making
-       you have – of course – Islam that makes some profession of faith in a Jesus of their own definition
 
Ø And back in the third century of the church – you had the heresy of Gnosticism – which professed a faith in Jesus…
·        but it was a Jesus defined by their Gnostic assumptions
-       which first of all meant that Jesus could not have had a physical body
·        In many cases – theirs was a phantom Jesus – a mere vision or spirit – who appeared before people – as though he walked on the earth – but in reality it was only an appearance
Ø For Gnostics – physical and material things were inherently evil – so for Jesus to be God and also to have a human body was impossible
·        They professed faith in Jesus but it was a Jesus of their own making
 
Ø And there have been those through history who profess faith in what you might call a “secular” Jesus
·        That is a Jesus who has been stripped of what they think are all the “myths” and “legends” surrounding Him
-       particularly myths related to Him having miraculous powers – or rising from the grave
-       their Jesus is the embodiment of a sort of “warrior” for some social or political cause
§  or a teacher of moral principles alone
·        And so they claim a belief in Jesus – and they make a claim to being a part of historic Christianity
 
Ø We might add a group here – whose claim of faith in Jesus is more mystical than anything else
·        For them – their faith in Jesus is little more than a preoccupation with their subjective experiences
-       The Jesus they worship is not so much the one who is revealed on the pages of Scripture as it is the one who conforms to their personal desires
-       He is little more than a divine “good luck charm” – or “magic spell”
 
Ø Against all these claims of faith in Jesus of some sort – is the profession of faith in the Historic Jesus
·        The Jesus revealed in the flesh – validated by miracles – verifies by the testimony of multiple witnesses
\\ Ø This is the Jesus that John is concerned with in the book of 1st John
·        and his concern is that this is the Jesus we profess
-       His great burden – as he writes this book – is to deal with those who have begun to profess a different kind of Jesus than the one declared by the apostles – in their NT writings
-       And John’s concern is for those who have fallen prey to false notions of Jesus
§  He wants to call them back from chasing whatever experiences they may be chasing
§  and to call them to a clear profession of the true Jesus – because it is only through that clear profession of faith in the right Jesus that people can truly experience the salvation and spiritual blessings He brings
 
Ø Now we will see this concern of John right from the beginning of the book of 1st John – in the first 4 verses
·        as John opens up this letter – not with the standard greetings that you find in most other NT letters
-       but with a straight-forward declaration of the Christ whom he and the other apostles had declared to the world
 
·        If you ever want to know the main point of a passage of Scripture – you normally look for the main verb
-       And in the opening verses of 1 John – the main verb is found in (v. 3) – “*we proclaim*” to you
§  Everything else in these opening verses sort of modifies that statement
 
·        This – then – is a statement about what the apostles proclaim
-       This is a definition of their proclamation
§  A definition of their message
§  A clarification statement of their gospel
 
Ø As I said – John bypasses the standard greeting that you will find in all other NT letters
·        even the greetings found in John’s other letters
-       so that he can go directly into this definition of the gospel
·        And his urgency here would seem out of place to people who think the gospel – and the message of Christ – doesn’t need that attention given to its definition
-       They are comfortable with what I call “ball park” theology
§  That is – “as long as you are ‘in the ball park’ somewhere – as long as you believe something about Jesus – it doesn’t matter whether your definition is precise or not
 
·        Or John’s urgency here wouldn’t make sense to people who think that you can spend too much time examining the gospel
-       I mean – didn’t John write a whole gospel account and record of Jesus’ life to clarify the gospel about Jesus
§  And it doesn’t make sense to them that John would then write yet another book to clarify this message
§  To them – perhaps the gospel has become mundane – or less than central
\\ Ø But to John – it was a matter of continual urgency
·        And it demanded continual attention…
-       not only so that it can be defended
-       and not only that it might be preached
-       but so that – by it – Christ can be worshipped and adored
 
Ø So – with this urgency – John opens this letter with Four Fundamental Realities              .
that Define the Apostolic Gospel
·        The Eternal Habitation of Christ
 
·        His Historic Manifestation
 
·        The Apostolic Proclamation
 
·        The Joyous Reconciliation
 
 
The first of these is…
*1.     **The Eternal Habitation of Christ*
 
Ø John begins this book – in a very similar way to how he began his gospel
·        He speaks of “that which was from the beginning”
-       And because John doesn’t use the personal pronoun “he”
§  Some people think he is talking about the “gospel” that was from the beginning
§  Or the gospel that was first preached by the apostles
 
 
Ø But we shouldn’t stumble over the fact that John didn’t use the personal pronoun “He”
·        Its obvious as you look at these opening verses – that he is talking about the Lord Jesus
-       He says at the end of verse one – that his subject is “the Word of Life”
-       And at the beginning of verse 2 – this “*life was manifest, and we have seen it*”
-       This “life” that John is talking about – is the Lord Jesus Christ
§  He is the One who said in John 14 – “I am the Way, the Truth and the Life”
 
Ø John opens his epistle – the same way he opened his gospel account – by establishing the eternal pre-existence of Jesus Christ
·        He is “from the beginning”
-       It is the same phrase he uses over in chapter 2:13, 14 to speak of believers who “*know him who is from the beginning*”
·        John is talking about the beginning of all things
-       The beginning of the universe
-       The pre-existent one
 
·        And – as we said a few weeks ago – when we looked at the opening words of John’s gospel…
-       bound up with this idea of “pre-existence” is the idea of “self-existence”
-       that is – Christ did not derive His life from anyone else
-       he possessed it through all eternity
\\ Ø Consequently – He can rightfully take upon himself the title “Lord of life”
·        He has life in Himself
-       He is one and the same with the “Living God”
-       And that is why John goes on to call Him the “Word of Life” here
 
·        Jesus Christ gives life – and He is able to give life – eternal life… because He is the source of life
-       Life doesn’t come from outside of Him
-       He is the Source of it
·        He is the eternal one
-       Who existed before all things
-       And gives life to all things
 
Ø John emphasizes this at the beginning of his gospel
·        He emphasizes it here at the beginning of His epistle
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9