Sermon Tone Analysis

Overall tone of the sermon

This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.1UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.09UNLIKELY
Fear
0.15UNLIKELY
Joy
0.62LIKELY
Sadness
0.48UNLIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.67LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.42UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.76LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.66LIKELY
Extraversion
0.27UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.15UNLIKELY
Emotional Range
0.48UNLIKELY

Tone of specific sentences

Tones
Emotion
Anger
Disgust
Fear
Joy
Sadness
Language
Analytical
Confident
Tentative
Social Tendencies
Openness
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Emotional Range
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
Welcome
Good morning!
I’m so glad to see all of you here this morning.
This is the part of the class where we have an opportunity to raise questions and share insights you have from your time reading, meditating on, and praying through this week’s text.
Okay, great!
Now let’s look a little closer at today’s text.
“John’s disciples and the Pharisees were fasting”: In the law only the fast of the Day of Atonement was required (Lev 16:29, 31; 23:27–32; Num 29:7), but after the Exile four other annual fasts were observed by Jews (Zech 7:5; 8:19).
Fasting was also frequently employed as an expression of mourning for the loss of someone or something (1 Sam 31:13; 2 Sam 1:12), and was often viewed as a sign of repentance marked by the symbols of mourning (Matt 6:16).
By New Testament times the stricter Pharisees fasted twice a week (Monday and Thursday; cf.
Luke 18:12), although we should note that their twice-weekly fasts were from 6 am to 6 pm.
The phrase “the disciples of the Pharisees” is unique and presents some difficulty because the Pharisees were a sect, and, as such, were not always necessarily teachers, which means they did not necessarily have disciples.
However, some were numbered among the scribes / teachers of the law (NIV), and would have had disciples.
But there’s another possible non-technical meaning here that might refer simply to people who were influenced by the teachings and practice of the sect of the Pharisees.
And this latter sense could also apply to “John’s disciples” as well.
We’re not told why these disciples were fasting.
John’s disciples could’ve been fasting because he might’ve been in prison by this time, or in anticipation of “the Messianic age”.
And those belonging to the Pharisees could’ve been observing one of their twice-weekly fasts.
Jesus answers their question with three illustrations:
The Bridegroom
The Unshrunk Cloth
The New Wineskins
Jesus used these vivid pictures to explain why his disciples did not fast.
His first picture comes from a Jewish wedding: Jewish couples did not go right away for their honeymoon, instead, they remained at home for a week or so, during which time they kept a sort of open-house with continual feasting and rejoicing.
In lives that were hard like theirs, a wedding week was the happiest of times.
The closest friends of the bride and bridegroom were invited to this wedding week of happiness, and called by the name “children of the bridechamber”.
So Jesus likened his company to men who were children of the bridechamber, chosen guests at a wedding feast.
What’s significant here is that there was actually a Rabbinic ruling that “All in attendance on the bridegroom are relieved of all religious observances which would lessen their joy.”
So Jesus’ answer to them draws on their own religious traditions that actually exempt wedding guests from all fasting.
This first metaphor is theologically taken from Hosea:
Here you’ll notice the “wilderness” theme present as a place of hope and renewal.
God will take Israel into the wilderness to deal with her, and in those days they will restore their love to God and depart from their idolatry.
So the bridegroom metaphor is repeatedly applied to God throughout the Old Testament and was frequently used of the Messiah’s coming.
Therefore, Jesus is implicitly saying that he is the messianic bridegroom, and the Messianic Age has dawned.
This language is then carried forward as part of the Christian’s anticipated hope:
The Messianic age is about the people of God being prepared for the day when they are finally united with their God, who has gone to prepare for them like a groom prepares for his bride.
Therefore, in much the same way, we prepare for this day like a bride prepares for the groom!
Jesus knew full-well that he was coming with a message which was startlingly new.
He also knew that his way of life was shatteringly different from what the orthodox Rabbinic teacher taught.
And he knew how hard it is for human minds to change or accept new truths.
I think the second and third metaphors illustrate how necessary it is to have an adventurous mind that is willing to change and think outside the boxes of our traditions.
The second metaphor draws on similar language to one of Jesus’ parables:
In this parable, the King gives a wedding celebration for his son.
So take all the wedding customs we’ve talked about so far and amplify them by about 100.
Not only was there an extended period of festivities, feastings, and celebrations, but the king would provide wedding garments for his guests, often basing their attire on some theme.
He provided the most luxurious of foods.
And would send his servants with personal invitations to his guests.
To refuse such an invitation is insult enough, but to mistreat the kings servants is a death-wish!
In Jesus’ parable, the king sends out his servants into the cities to invite everyone to the banquet, symbolizing the gospel’s invitation to all peoples.
Somewhere along the roads and gathering places, the king’s servants invited a man who did not put on the king’s wedding garments.
He came in his street clothes.
This too was a serious insult!
So in the King’s wrath the man is tossed out into the darkness and excluded from the life of the wedding celebration.
Jesus’ answer draws on this kind of language.
These disciples, being invited to the King’s wedding feast, are looking at their old, tattered clothes and thinking about how they can patch them up.
Maybe their thinking they can put a brand new patch to sort of spruce up their old tattered cloths a little bit.
But not only would their new patch not match their clothes, a point Jesus makes in Luke’s account (Luke 5:36-38), but when the new patch shrinks, it will tear and make an even bigger whole, thus ruining the garment altogether!
Wine was an integral part of their culture.
Wine and alcohol didn’t have much of the moral associations it now has today.
Not only was wine a vital part of their industry, but it was also an integral part of their life, being involved in everything from their religious celebrations to their daily consumption.
(Read the graphic).
In ancient times wine was kept in goatskins.
New skins were soft and pliable, so they could stretch as the wine completed its fermentation.
However, old wineskins that had already been stretched would become brittle, so the gas from the fermenting wine would burst them open, destroying both wine and wineskins.
New wine is another important image in both old and new testament symbolism:
You’ll remember that Peter then defends what the people had just witnessed by citing the fulfillment of Joel’s prophecy.
And it’s interesting that the imagery of the very thing they accuse Jesus’ disciples of being drunk on actually features in Joel’s prophecy:
So Jesus is telling them that before they can be fit for the new wine that God is pouring out in their day, they must be made new.
God will not pour this new wine into the old, brittle container of their religious customs and traditions.
So those who want what God is doing in their day must be willing to let go of their old traditions and receive what God is doing in new ways!
Importantly, Jesus’ third illustration draws on his first miracle:
Understanding Fasting
So, because our culture is so unfamiliar with fasting, with the time leftover I wanted to explain what happens to your body during fasting.
Just so you know, I’ve primarily drawn my information from a book on fasting written by Dr. Fung.
His clinic has done the leading research on fasting, and I really recommend checking it out.
First, during fasting insulin levels drop.
Insulin is your body’s hormone responsible for controlling energy use and storage; it tells your body when to burn energy and when to store energy (higher levels tell your body to store energy, and lower levels tell your body to burn energy).
Our body stores energy in different forms: Glycogen, which is the glucose stored in the liver, is your first energy reserve, and your body stores enough glycogen for about 24 – 36/hours of energy.
Your liver will produce new glucose from amino acids through a process called “gluconeogenesis”.
During this phase, your blood sugar levels will fall but remain within a safe and healthy range.
Your body’s other form of stored energy is fat.
After about 36-48 hours of fasting, your body will enter the state of Ketosis, during which low insulin levels stimulates the breakdown of fat into usable energy through a process known as lipolysis.
This stage is actually characterized by increased cognitive function because of the ketones released into the blood.
After about five days of fasting, your body enters a phase of protein-conservation and starts producing high levels of growth hormones to maintain muscle mass and lean tissues.
Your body’s energy is supplied almost entirely by fatty acids and ketones during this phase, and adrenaline prevents decreased metabolism.
So you can see how during the first phases of fasting you might be tempted to “disfigure your face” and wear a scowl.
The initial phases of fasting are most difficult.
But fasting is always God-facing, not to impress other people.
So we’re meant to let the sacrifices of our fasting be seen by God.
Jesus actually teaches his disciples to take measures to refresh themselves so that they don’t draw inappropriate attention to their fasting that might ruin their fast at the heart-level by causing them to use their fasting to draw people’s admiration.
Most modern day people don’t have the problems first century Jews might face, and so anointing their head with oil might not refresh us in the same way as it would them.
But there are a number of measures you can take if you know what is happening:
Mentally prepare yourself for these various phases
Stay hydrated so your body can flush out toxins (but don’t over hydrate!!!)
Drink bone-broth to supply your body with necessary minerals to avoid intense headaches
I could go on at length about the process of fasting and the steps you can take so that your fasting isn’t obvious to everyone, but my purpose in this lesson isn’t to give you a science lesson in physiology.
The lesson that I want to emphasize here is that we can address some of the external side-effects of fasting so that we can live a relatively normal life while fasting and not draw excessive attention to our fasting.
The purpose in this is to practice our fasting towards God alone!
Here’s the last point that I want to make: Jesus’ teaching about the private nature of wasn’t intended to make fasting a matter of top-secret national security.
In just the same way that his teaching about the private nature of prayer doesn’t mean that we’re not allowed to pray publicly, I believe we should see our leaders set an example for us in fasting.
Considering that “example” is one of the mandates of Christian leadership, our leaders should set an example for us to follow in fasting.
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9